Ahoy Shipmates!!!
Join me for an in box review of the newest 1/350 ship from Aoshima, the IJN Nagara 5,500 ton Cruiser.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
You are viewing the archived version of the site.
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
General Ship Modeling
Discuss modeling techniques, experiences, and ship modeling in general.
Discuss modeling techniques, experiences, and ship modeling in general.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
REVIEW
IJN Nagara - 1/350goldenpony
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Posted: Friday, October 16, 2009 - 01:34 AM UTC
Posted: Friday, October 16, 2009 - 03:51 AM UTC
Hi Jim
Congrats on a good review of one of my favorite class of ships
Although tempting, I am still going to stick to my 700th scale ones
BZ
Rui
Congrats on a good review of one of my favorite class of ships
Although tempting, I am still going to stick to my 700th scale ones
BZ
Rui
Rab
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 03, 2006
KitMaker: 353 posts
Model Shipwrights: 207 posts
Joined: October 03, 2006
KitMaker: 353 posts
Model Shipwrights: 207 posts
Posted: Friday, October 16, 2009 - 10:01 PM UTC
Jim, you said in your verdict that "even with some problems here and there...", what did you find that you concidered problems? I've built it with the Aoshima P/E sets and found no problems at all, in fact, it was one of the most smoothest and enjoyable builds I've done in a long, long time.
goldenpony
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2009 - 01:58 AM UTC
Kym,
I have no doubts it was a nice building kit. I just found a few small spots where the kit and some pictures I had just did not seem to match up. It could be the pictures and kit reflected different times in the age of the ship.
I hope that makes sense.
I have no doubts it was a nice building kit. I just found a few small spots where the kit and some pictures I had just did not seem to match up. It could be the pictures and kit reflected different times in the age of the ship.
I hope that makes sense.
JMartine
New Jersey, United States
Joined: October 18, 2007
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,514 posts
Joined: October 18, 2007
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,514 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - 02:02 PM UTC
nice review... a tad pricey though, considering the size and amount of PE included...
I appreciate when reviewers include how much PE (or AMs) is included in the kits, that fact influences my to buy (and hide from wife) list of kits
I appreciate when reviewers include how much PE (or AMs) is included in the kits, that fact influences my to buy (and hide from wife) list of kits
goldenpony
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 - 02:42 PM UTC
James,
The kit from Hobby World Japan is about $73.00, including shipping. I have the Kuma coming and paid just over $73.00 total for it. Of course with the Yen gaining it is costing more, but it is still cheaper than here in the states.
The kit from Hobby World Japan is about $73.00, including shipping. I have the Kuma coming and paid just over $73.00 total for it. Of course with the Yen gaining it is costing more, but it is still cheaper than here in the states.