Ahoy Shipmates!!!
Our new friend Keith Butterley gives us an in box review of Zvezda''s 1/350 Battleship Sevastopol.
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
You are viewing the archived version of the site.
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
New Content
Announcements on new content additions to the site.
Announcements on new content additions to the site.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
REVIEW
Zvezda 1/350 Battleship Sevastopolgoldenpony
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 - 11:55 AM UTC
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Model Shipwrights: 833 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Model Shipwrights: 833 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 - 06:19 AM UTC
If there were no 'lows' to the kit, why a low rating (80)?
vonHengest
Texas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Model Shipwrights: 350 posts
Joined: June 29, 2010
KitMaker: 5,854 posts
Model Shipwrights: 350 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 - 05:50 PM UTC
You'll have to read through Keith's review, but they are there. He simply didn't include them in the ratings box at the bottom.
goldenpony
Zimbabwe
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Joined: July 03, 2007
KitMaker: 3,529 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,419 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013 - 05:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
If there were no 'lows' to the kit, why a low rating (80)?
There were no lows listed on the submitted review. So, if you take 100 being perfect, which is hard. 90, really good, 80 average, 70 below, etc... I think that is a good rating. The other Zvezda kits I have run acorss, they are very good soild kits, but not always super detailed.
Tailor
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: May 26, 2008
KitMaker: 1,168 posts
Model Shipwrights: 676 posts
Joined: May 26, 2008
KitMaker: 1,168 posts
Model Shipwrights: 676 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 02, 2013 - 02:19 AM UTC
Nasty ejector pin marks along both sides of te hull showing through. That'll take a LOT of work to make them disappear. Otherwise it is good basic kit I think an 80 is a bit high, but within the range of what I thought.
RedDuster
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: March 01, 2010
KitMaker: 7,078 posts
Model Shipwrights: 6,649 posts
Joined: March 01, 2010
KitMaker: 7,078 posts
Model Shipwrights: 6,649 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 02, 2013 - 09:18 PM UTC
Looks a good solid kit, and for the price well worth it, I am up for one, and the Pontos upgrade.
Si
Si
Watermark
Flemish Brabant, Belgium
Joined: March 14, 2013
KitMaker: 1 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1 posts
Joined: March 14, 2013
KitMaker: 1 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 14, 2013 - 06:58 AM UTC
Hi all,
Seems to me the shape of the bow of this kit is wrong. The rrounding of the inerted ram bow should be submerged. But if you paint your waterline, starting just above the ram all the way to the back, as it should be, it appears that the lower connecting points of the torpedo-net stanchions are below the waterline !!!! I used a peice of plasticard inserted in the bow and putty on both sides to correct the bow.
Seems to me the shape of the bow of this kit is wrong. The rrounding of the inerted ram bow should be submerged. But if you paint your waterline, starting just above the ram all the way to the back, as it should be, it appears that the lower connecting points of the torpedo-net stanchions are below the waterline !!!! I used a peice of plasticard inserted in the bow and putty on both sides to correct the bow.