_GOTOBOTTOM
Ships by Class/Type
For discussions on ships by class and type.
News
Merit: USS Yorktown CV-5
Aurora-7
#360
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: June 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,020 posts
Model Shipwrights: 630 posts
Posted: Monday, December 22, 2014 - 02:21 AM UTC


I just stumbled across this today at the Merit site and states it's availability as 'NOW' and is reported to be of 'new tooling'. The first ship in the 3 ship Yorktown class of fleet carriers, Yorktown was built from lessons learned from the smaller Ranger class and converted from cruiser Lexington class ships.

Read the Full News Story

If you have comments or questions please post them here.

Thanks!
warreni
Visit this Community
South Australia, Australia
Joined: August 14, 2007
KitMaker: 5,926 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,624 posts
Posted: Monday, December 22, 2014 - 07:55 AM UTC
Oh no! Another 'unbuildable' Trumpeter kit.. The kit is supposed to portray the carrier as it appeared in 1943.. Only one large problem with that... Anybody, anybody??
Littorio
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 15, 2004
KitMaker: 4,728 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,080 posts
Posted: Monday, December 22, 2014 - 09:23 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Oh no! Another 'unbuildable' Trumpeter kit.. The kit is supposed to portray the carrier as it appeared in 1943.. Only one large problem with that... Anybody, anybody??



Me, me ,me, Yorktown was lost in 1942.

I'll wait and see what this is like before I make judgement but I do hope that they have the hull right with the Yorktown I so want to add a WWII fleet carrier to my model navy.
TracyWhite
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: January 18, 2005
KitMaker: 527 posts
Model Shipwrights: 464 posts
Posted: Monday, December 22, 2014 - 10:02 AM UTC
The year is a typo - the kit represents Yorktown at the time of her loss at the Battle of Midway.

The hull shape is about as good as can be. The hull plating too pronounced and is a bit off lower down, but this may be a matter of taste for people.
warreni
Visit this Community
South Australia, Australia
Joined: August 14, 2007
KitMaker: 5,926 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,624 posts
Posted: Monday, December 22, 2014 - 01:57 PM UTC
Didn't you see the sarcasm dripping from my 'unbuildable' comment (hence the quotation marks)?
Naseby
Visit this Community
Slovakia
Joined: October 15, 2010
KitMaker: 825 posts
Model Shipwrights: 97 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 - 03:16 AM UTC
Based on the pictures of the hull, this one is better then Trumpys Hornet. Also discussions on ship relater forums seem to praise the shapes. I never bought the Hornet from Trumpeter due to all the shape issues and it seems I made a right decision. I will definitely get this one.
Littorio
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 15, 2004
KitMaker: 4,728 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,080 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 - 03:31 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Oh no! Another 'unbuildable' Trumpeter kit.. The kit is supposed to portray the carrier as it appeared in 1943.. Only one large problem with that... Anybody, anybody??



Does this mean it will have some holes in it's side be a bit twisted and you need to paint it rusty! Oh wait you can use the Trumpy kit for that

Seeing some of the sprue shots I think I'll give this one a go, just watched the Battle of Midway film on the TV again over the weekend so I'm in the mood for a Yorktown class.
TracyWhite
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: January 18, 2005
KitMaker: 527 posts
Model Shipwrights: 464 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 - 10:24 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Didn't you see the sarcasm dripping from my 'unbuildable' comment (hence the quotation marks)?



I was only responding to you?
warreni
Visit this Community
South Australia, Australia
Joined: August 14, 2007
KitMaker: 5,926 posts
Model Shipwrights: 2,624 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 - 02:54 PM UTC
And if you build the Trumpeter Hornet as a waterline model the problems may disappear? Please go ahead Luciano as I will be very interested to see how it comes out.

Let's see what the reviews come up with for this one.
Littorio
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 15, 2004
KitMaker: 4,728 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,080 posts
Posted: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 - 10:55 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Please go ahead Luciano as I will be very interested to see how it comes out.

Let's see what the reviews come up with for this one.



Warren I've just got my first carrier the Dragon 1/350 USS Princeton and have the Hasegawa USS Gambier Bay on order, when the Yorktown becomes available over here in Blighty I'll pick one up.

What's the Trumpeter Lex or Sara like? I can't find many reviews on them.
MartinJQuinn
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 574 posts
Model Shipwrights: 530 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 28, 2014 - 11:03 PM UTC

Quoted Text

What's the Trumpeter Lex or Sara like? I can't find many reviews on them.



Sara reviews:
http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/tru/kit_tru_5607.shtml

http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-03/350-trump/trumpeter-review.html

http://www.internetmodeler.com/2006/october/first-looks/trumpeter_sara.php

Build of Sara:
http://www.hyperscale.com/2008/galleries/saratogars_1.htm

http://www.modelshipgallery.com/gallery/cv/cv-03/350-pvb/pvb-index.html

Lex reviews:
http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/tru/kit_tru_5608.shtml

http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/cv/cv-02/350-trump/lexington.html

http://www.ipmsusa3.org/reviews/Kits/Ships/Trumpeter_350_Lex/Trumpeter_350_Lex.htm

https://modelshipwrights.kitmaker.net/features/762

Lex builds:
http://modelingmadness.com/review/misc/ships/robertolex.htm

http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/builds/tru/build_tru_5716.shtml

https://modelshipwrights.kitmaker.net/features/842




Littorio
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 15, 2004
KitMaker: 4,728 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,080 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 28, 2014 - 11:23 PM UTC
Thank you Martin, of those reviews only one mentions the hull shape good or bad in this case good so I think a Sara will join my fleet sometime in the future.
MartinJQuinn
Visit this Community
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 19, 2005
KitMaker: 574 posts
Model Shipwrights: 530 posts
Posted: Monday, December 29, 2014 - 09:25 PM UTC
I've built the Lexington kit twice. Once as Lex, and the other I back dated it to a circa 1940 Saratoga (this was before the Sara kit came out). I liked the model. While it's not 100% accurate (there was someone here who super detalied a Lex), it LOOKS like a Lexington and Saratoga when finished.

Here is what I posted over on the MW.com forums back in 2006:

"The model certainly LOOKS like the Lexington when completed. The biggest questions are with the configuration of the island. According to Robert Stern, in "The Lexington Class Carriers", when the Lex was scheduled to get her flag plot extended (this is the level above the navigation bridge), Lex didn't want the same open arrangement that Saratoga had (Sara's flag plot had been extended in the mid-30's). I don't have the text from the book with me at work - I'll look it up tonight and edit this post with what Stern says.

Anyway, it "looks" like Lex had her entire flag plot enclosed, with the forward portion enclosed by bulletproof glass and splinter shielding, which is how Trumpeter elected to depict her. What's definitely wrong here is the "open" portion of the platforms on either side of the flag plot level - they are the wrong shape and it didn't have splinter sheilding (which looks to be about knee high).

Additionally, the range finder was moved from the top of the navigation bridge to the top of the newly extended flag plot (the kit does depict this). There also appears to be another rangefinder or director on top of the spotting top in pictures. One thing I didn't try to correct: The island doesn't have the correct shape - the real ships had more of a curve to the back of the island (supposedly for aerodynamic reasons).

Again, what's been published is all we have to go on now, and using those sources I made some assumptions and finished my model following those quesses. I do not have any original source documents, my hunches were all based on secondary sources and discussions between myself, Tracy White and Ron Smith (both of whom are much more knowledgeable than I).

Here is a list of the things I did to the Trumpeter model:
•The lower hull is a little narrower than the upper hull, and needs to be widened using spreaders to get a snug fit. (I've heard from some modelers that didn't have this problem - test fit your hull first if you are building her full hull).

•My hull was warped, which gave me trouble when fitting the flight deck – I had to fit the flight deck one section at a time, which let to other issues (seams between the 3 pieces of the deck).

•I found the splinter shields for the 1.1 inch (28mm) gun tubs (the ones which replaced the 8 inch gun mounts) too shallow and replaced them with spare gun tubs from my YMW Lexington. Also, pictures clearly show bracing on the outside of these tubs. The YMW tubs have bracing, but I added more. I also deleted the Mk 44 director from the 1.1 gun tub directly in front of the island - it didn't look like the two 1.1s and the director could realistically fit in that tub.

•The splinter shields for the 20mm platforms in the boat pockets are too shallow. I replaced these with brass strip. These also had bracing on the outside of the tubs, which I added with plastic strip.

•As previously mentioned, the shape of the rear of the flag plot platform on the island is incorrect (it should flare out from the bridge), plus Trumpeter omitted the searchlight platforms on the roof of the flag plot. The searchlights should be bumped up a level and a pair of signal lamps added to the navigation level - you'll have to scratchbuild the searchlight platforms on the flag plot level. I also added a rangerfinder to the top of the spotting top - though my "quess" is that this may be a Mk 44 director for the 1.1 guns.

•The rear legs for the Trumpeter supplied tripod foremast look “stepped”, since Trumpeter elected to seperate these into two pieces per side. These legs should be continuous, so I replaced them with brass rod.

•The funnel cap is the wrong shape and too wide. Trumpeter molded this piece with “wings” that don’t belong there. The actual funnel cap was curved, not flat, and Trumpeter replicated the curve with these wings. Sand them back till they are closer to the funnel sides.

•The island is too far inboard from the side of the ship. I removed the molded on guides from the flight deck, re-scribed the flight deck and moved it to the correct position.

•The rudder has the right profile, but is the wrong width and shape when viewed from behind. I made it wider to more accurately reflect the correct shape.

Also prominently missing from the kit is the degaussing cable that appears to go all the way around the hull. Since I couldn't find any proper documentation for this, I elected to leave it off.

Do you have to make all these changes? Of course not. It's your model, and will build into an impressive model directly out of the box. However, "Queen of the Flat Tops" was one of the first books I ever remembering reading as a kid. After reading that book, I fell in love with the Lady Lex. I've waited my entire adult life for a 1/350 Lexington, so I eagerly bought the Blue Water Navy version when it came out. However, in my opinion, that version is only correct for the Lexington prior to her short March/April 1942 refit, and then only when you use the 8 inch gun mounts.

So, when Trumpeter announced a May 1942 version of the Lexington, I was probably the only person who was happy about it. Therefore, I went as far as my middle-of-the-road modeling skills would take me, and did the old gal up as best I could. I still have to complete the air group - but need to check to see if Lex's planes had white or black squadron markings on the fuselage before proceeding. The YMW decals have black markings, but I've seen some things that indicate they were white.

Eventually I plan to build the YMW kit - which is a magnificent model and is beautifully cast - as a waterline February 1942 version of the Lexington, in Ms 12. I know Wipers "Lexington-class" pictorial dates the picture of the Lex in Ms 12 as August 1941, but I think that's wrong. The planes appear to have red and white rudder stripes, which weren't in use in August 1941 - they were ordered painted on the planes in late December 1941/Janury 1942 (IIRC). (He also has a picture captioned as the "triumphant return of the strike group from the sinking of the Shoho". If you look closely, those planes are F6Fs with 1944 era markings).

Anyway - that's my non-expert take on the Trumpeter Lexington. It needs some work, but it is impressive when finished. Hope this helps. I'll be happy to answer any questions you have."
Littorio
Visit this Community
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: September 15, 2004
KitMaker: 4,728 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,080 posts
Posted: Monday, December 29, 2014 - 09:47 PM UTC
Martin thank you for your very detailed reply. The reason for asking about the hull (all mine are built full hull) is after hearing about the Trumpeter Essex class issues I wanted to check on the Lex/Sara before paying out for one, I'm not a rivet counter but do want it to look right.

I'll be getting a Yorktown and an Enterprise CV-6 now she's been announced (late war fit would be nice) I want an Essex class but with the hull issues I don't know, so the Sara in her 1930's fit seems a better option.
 _GOTOTOP