Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: January 11, 2009
KitMaker: 673 posts
Model Shipwrights: 386 posts
Posted: Monday, December 31, 2012 - 12:13 PM UTC
YES! Very good news for 2013:
U-boat type IXc in 1:72
http://www.plastik-modellbau.org/blog/revell-neuheiten-2013/2013/ Bad news: we have to wait 11 months!

and a HAPPY NEW YEAR!
Michael
Putrajaya, Malaysia
Joined: March 04, 2004
KitMaker: 2,511 posts
Model Shipwrights: 89 posts
Posted: Monday, December 31, 2012 - 12:50 PM UTC
wow....a great kit to begin my sea trial back.... looking forward .. we got 11 months to save some $$
Thanks for the head up..
and Happy New Year
The more i know, the less I understand!!!!

#084
Quebec, Canada
Joined: September 14, 2005
KitMaker: 2,485 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,157 posts
Posted: Monday, December 31, 2012 - 07:47 PM UTC
Excellent News!!!
And if they follow in the steps of the type VII release,
I am sure we will see it in 1:144 scale as well.
Way to go Revell!
Cheers,
Joe
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2013 - 11:43 AM UTC
I hope the lack of a pressure hull will be addressed in this kit. It's one reason my 7 has stayed in the stash: too much AM work required.
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2006
KitMaker: 63 posts
Model Shipwrights: 57 posts
Posted: Monday, January 06, 2014 - 04:22 AM UTC
hehehe I picked up my kit last week and it is NICE. Based on U505 that is currently on display in Chicago.
Lots of discussions already underway for building this boat nicely:
http://models.rokket.biz/index.php?topic=1036.0Eduard will have 3 PE sets for this boat (53106, 53107, 53108): 1st one is already available, the other 2 in February.
Someone is making a PE set with full decking, and it will be available very shortly:
http://www.rcsubs.cz/index.php/models/models/69-typ-ixAnd apparently CMK is up to something, but it's rumour at this point.
I haven't been this excited for a model release in a LONG time.


#360
Connecticut, United States
Joined: June 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,020 posts
Model Shipwrights: 630 posts
Posted: Monday, January 06, 2014 - 05:18 AM UTC
Please oh, please! Someone release another IJN submarine in 1/72!
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." - John Paul Jones
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Monday, January 06, 2014 - 10:02 AM UTC
Nice PE grates. But no way to purchase them. White Ensign Models have anything in the pipe on this?
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Model Shipwrights: 3,509 posts
Posted: Monday, January 06, 2014 - 01:07 PM UTC
Got a notice from Freetime on Sat saw it...pre-ordered it..got news today (2 days later) that it had shipped. Zowie!!!! Hoping for an aftermarket deck gun for her, as looking at kit photos, it seems they aren't giving that option. I am sure CMK will come up with all sorts of goodies like they did when the VII was released. Oh lordy another round of drilling out limber holes.
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it
VMI "76
Order of the Red Nose Plug
Blue Volute Bumper Spring Award
California, United States
Joined: August 08, 2008
KitMaker: 1,274 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,236 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 09:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Please oh, please! Someone release another IJN submarine in 1/72!
Too bad Lindberg got burned by that awful I-53 release because their pics of the prototype I-20 kit looked darn good. Maybe RoG could buy their molds?
--Karl
On the ways:
1:96 USS Constitution
1:96 USS Richmond (1862)
Launched:
1:96 USS Cumberland (1862)

#084
Quebec, Canada
Joined: September 14, 2005
KitMaker: 2,485 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,157 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 09:44 AM UTC
From my understanding, the lines were all wrong and much of the
detail....out of scale. The bow was just a disaster.
Maybe RoG can bring a new mold to the market of a Japanese sub, properly designed, but first a Type XXI...

Cheers,
Joe
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: January 11, 2009
KitMaker: 673 posts
Model Shipwrights: 386 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 09:56 AM UTC
Due to the positions of the flood holes it's possible to build the following type IXc-boats:
U-68
U-125 - U-131
U-153 - U-158
U-503 - U-512
(VOZM Uboottyp IX c)
Therefore I'll check my "U-Boot im Focus"-booklets...
Michael
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 10:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Due to the positions of the flood holes it's possible to build the following type IXc-boats:
U-68
U-125 - U-131
U-153 - U-158
U-503 - U-512
Michael, are you saying that this kit could NOT be the 505? That would be most disappointing, as it's the most famous of the IXs.

#084
Quebec, Canada
Joined: September 14, 2005
KitMaker: 2,485 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,157 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 10:35 AM UTC
Hi Bill,
I interpret the previous post as U503 to U512.
I hope I am not wrong....besides, RoG had U505 in Chicago
to go by.
Hope they did not do such a goof.
Cheers,
Joe
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: January 11, 2009
KitMaker: 673 posts
Model Shipwrights: 386 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 - 03:40 PM UTC
...to correct my posting:
U-68
U-125 to U-131
U-153 to U-158
U-503 to U-512
all boats with the same position an number of flood holes, including U-505!
Michael
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 - 03:24 AM UTC
Thanks for clearing that up, I read it incorrectly, but wanted to make sure. It looks like a lovely kit, though the lack of a FULL pressure hull is the thing that has held me back from starting the VII in my stash.
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Model Shipwrights: 3,509 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 - 11:26 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Thanks for clearing that up, I read it incorrectly, but wanted to make sure. It looks like a lovely kit, though the lack of a FULL pressure hull is the thing that has held me back from starting the VII in my stash.
I am pretty sure someone came out with one for the VII. Probably long out of production though. You could more than likely fabricate enough of one to show if you drill out the limber holes. I got a metal replacement deck for mine and chopped up the original part to give teh appearance. Probably not gonna fool around with all that on this one (IX)though.
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it
VMI "76
Order of the Red Nose Plug
Blue Volute Bumper Spring Award
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 09, 2014 - 05:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I am pretty sure someone came out with one for the VII.
It was a partial suitable only for a waterline build.
Quoted Text
You could more than likely fabricate enough of one to show if you drill out the limber holes.
Yes, there are instructions
here about how to build one, but it's not a project for the faint-hearted.
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Model Shipwrights: 3,509 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 09, 2014 - 11:06 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
I am pretty sure someone came out with one for the VII.
It was a partial suitable only for a waterline build.
Quoted Text
You could more than likely fabricate enough of one to show if you drill out the limber holes.
Yes, there are instructions here about how to build one, but it's not a project for the faint-hearted.
Might I suggest you look through Daniel Moscatelli's thread on the U 552. He did a super job on building a nice partial pressure hull. You would not be able to see most of it and the detail he did doesn't look all that difficult
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it
VMI "76
Order of the Red Nose Plug
Blue Volute Bumper Spring Award
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Monday, January 13, 2014 - 06:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Might I suggest you look through Daniel Moscatelli's thread on the U 552. He did a super job on building a nice partial pressure hull. You would not be able to see most of it and the detail he did doesn't look all that difficult
I found it
here. and it looks like a partial solution, but still very interesting.
United States
Joined: May 01, 2010
KitMaker: 93 posts
Model Shipwrights: 89 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - 01:53 AM UTC
Nautilus makes an upper pressure hull for the type VII. Blue Ridge also has a type VII pressure hull and has announced a type IXC pressure hull and replacement wood deck. CMK has open sections for the type VII and has announced the same for the type IX Anything else is scratch work but I'm guessing you already know that.
I guess that's why it's modeling and not assembling.
Dave
Montevideo, Uruguay
Joined: August 22, 2011
KitMaker: 998 posts
Model Shipwrights: 941 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - 02:24 AM UTC

Je jeje is correct. All the modelers plough waiting for these announcements to start!!!! Jajjajaj
Also we will have to empty our wallets
Regards Daniel
" My bigger dread is to look at the history of my life and to ask me what I did with her "
Joined: October 30, 2005
KitMaker: 3,897 posts
Model Shipwrights: 3,301 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - 06:44 AM UTC
bill_c
Campaigns AdministratorNew Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Model Shipwrights: 306 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 - 08:59 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Nautilus makes an upper pressure hull for the type VII.
Not that I can find on their website.
Quoted Text
Blue Ridge also has a type VII pressure hull and has announced a type IXC pressure hull and replacement wood deck.
It is, sadly, a partial solution and not cheap ($36).
Quoted Text
I guess that's why it's modeling and not assembling.
We all have our limits, especially for features that are mostly hidden by the model. But with so much visible once the drain holes are opened up, one has to do something. The most thorough solution is
this one, but you could also call it the craziest.