Ships by Class/Type: Military Small Craft
For topics on PT boats, landing craft, Vietnam riverine, etc.
PT 109 Question
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Model Shipwrights: 173 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2014 - 06:16 AM UTC
Garth,
I think Mr Ross was just qouting my comment, he wasn't saying the decks were covered in canvas. But his comment on the fabric being between the two layers of wood, and the non skid decking treatment correspond with what my friend told me regarding the work here at the local boatyard-- there may have been some kind of frabric glued between the layers of decking (used for strength perhaps?) that the boatyard had difficulty removing, leading them to believe the decks were canvas covered. Perhaps this is what the veterans were referring to also. I think the main point is, you wouldn't see any trace of wood seams in the deck, as the photos attest. Along with that, in 1/72 scale, you certainly wouldn't see the seams. I'm not so sure in 1/35 scale. Has anyone got any experience with the restored boats (I've heard there are two)? It's really too bad Paul has passed on, I think he had the answer. Final point is, in 1/72 you wouldn't see any seams, so WEM is right-- sand off the grain in the Revell kit(s). VR Russ
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2014 - 06:38 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Garth,
I think Mr Ross was just qouting my comment, he wasn't saying the decks were covered in canvas.



Thank you, Russ.

Al Ross
TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2014 - 06:36 PM UTC
No, Al ...

I'm not the idiot you take me as and you'd want people to think I am.

Your statement:"Given what they used to do pre-war, along with veteran statements, I'd go with the canvas glued to the deck." was clear enough.

Especially the last six words "the canvas glued to the deck" ....

To the deck, not sandwiched between the layers.

Al, I think it's time for us to have a discussion offboard.
SamGruster
Visit this Community
United States
Joined: April 23, 2014
KitMaker: 7 posts
Model Shipwrights: 7 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2014 - 10:39 PM UTC
Lol Al, you have my sympathy. I see he posted a more rabid version of his misunderstanding on his Facebook PT page:

Tim Connelly

May I show you what level of disrespect I've been shown by one "PT expert"?

He jumps on me for stating something I was told and makes me feel like an idiot ...

And now, he says that he'd go with something a vet told someone which was VERBATIM what I said a few years ago, about the decks of PT boats being covered by canvas and made me feel like an idiot for even bringing it up?

Excuse my French, but what the f***?

T. Garth Connelly


He used his FB page to attack the pt103.com owner too: http://www.pt103.com/tgp/trsogesakvr.html

I've notified Trixie Delight, maybe she can do something about this.
TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Monday, November 17, 2014 - 10:57 PM UTC
Sigh ................................


Quoted Text

Lol Al, you have my sympathy. I see he posted a more rabid version of his misunderstanding on his Facebook PT page:

Tim Connelly

May I show you what level of disrespect I've been shown by one "PT expert"?

He jumps on me for stating something I was told and makes me feel like an idiot ...

And now, he says that he'd go with something a vet told someone which was VERBATIM what I said a few years ago, about the decks of PT boats being covered by canvas and made me feel like an idiot for even bringing it up?

Excuse my French, but what the f***?

T. Garth Connelly


He used his FB page to attack the pt103.com owner too: http://www.pt103.com/tgp/trsogesakvr.html

I've notified Trixie Delight, maybe she can do something about this.

TracyWhite
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: January 18, 2005
KitMaker: 527 posts
Model Shipwrights: 464 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 - 10:18 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Anyone have pictures, drawings, or info about just how it was mounted? It would make an interesting modification. Al



Same boat, different angle:

TAFFY3
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 2,531 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,244 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 01:59 AM UTC
Thanks for the photo of that 20mm mount on the 157 boat. I'd be tempted to do that modification, if and when, I decide what boat to do with my stashed 109 kit. Was that a factory installation or a field modification? If so, were any other boats using that gun mount? Does anyone know if, at the time of that photo, the 157 still mounted her torpedo tubes, or was she using the roll-off racks instead? Any and all help is appreciated. The more that I learn about these boats, the more questions I have. Al
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 03:23 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Thanks for the photo of that 20mm mount on the 157 boat. I'd be tempted to do that modification, if and when, I decide what boat to do with my stashed 109 kit. Was that a factory installation or a field modification? If so, were any other boats using that gun mount? Does anyone know if, at the time of that photo, the 157 still mounted her torpedo tubes, or was she using the roll-off racks instead? Any and all help is appreciated. The more that I learn about these boats, the more questions I have. Al



PT157 was a RON9 boat. The other boats in the squadron were PT126, 151-162, 187, 318, & 319. The MK12 was a BUORD mount. For a great discussion on the mount's actual fitment to the boats in the RON, go here: http://www.ptboatforum.com/cgi-bin/MB2/netboardr.cgi?fid=102&cid=101&tid=1806&st=40&nd=50&pg=1&sc=20
As you can see in the photos below, 157 was fitted with the mount when she still had tubes and after the tubes were replaced with the roll-off racks.


The gunner in Tracy's photo (Jim Smith) looks to me like the same guy in the photo with the tubes.

Al Ross
TAFFY3
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 2,531 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,244 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 04:33 AM UTC
Thanks for the comeback and the info, Al. Two things I noticed. First, in the upper photo you can clearly see the counterweight on the back of the mount. Second, in the upper photo, the hatch located on deck just in front of the superstructure opens forward (away), but in the lower photo it opens aft (towards). And the photos raise another question concerning the area of the windshield. I can see some straps and it almost looks like they're securing a folding windscreen of some sort. And not to be a pain, but did the 157 still retain her original mast the whole time she had her tubes, or could a radar have been mounted, before she received her roll-off racks? Thanks again for your help. Al
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 05:27 AM UTC
Al. Check this out: http://www.amazon.com/First-Up-Chronicles-Rendova-July-August/dp/0615592007/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1416442960&sr=8-1&keywords=pt157+bridge&pebp=1416442954468
There is also a companion book on building a model of 157
http://www.amazon.com/PT-157-Scale-Model-Builders-Notebook/dp/0615483232/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1416443782&sr=8-2&keywords=pt157

Bridge is a regular contributor on the PT Boat Forum and seems to have done his homework. I don't have the book yet, so am not sure what sort of material is in there, but suspect it may answer a lot of questions you might have. I'll look around some more in my RON9 photos, too.

Al Ross
TAFFY3
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 2,531 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,244 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 04:11 PM UTC
Thanks again, Al. I promptly ordered the 1st book on the 157, not sure about the second. I may end up with that one too eventually. The 157 sure seems to fit the bill with what I wanted to do with my 109 kit, an early war boat, but not a run of the mill OOB build. Al
dioman13
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: August 19, 2007
KitMaker: 2,184 posts
Model Shipwrights: 204 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2014 - 09:04 AM UTC
Hey Al, a few questions for you. Was the 157 the only boat in Ron 9 or others to mount the 20 m.m. in the gun tub or did the rest of them do so also? And in the book, Devil Boats, The P.T. Wat Against Japan, by William Breuer; it has the same pic. 1st set of pics after page 78, 6th set of pic's. of the 157 as your first pic but at a more center line angle. The gun tub on the right side of the pic shows what appears to be another 20m.m. or is it just the angle where maybe the 2 barrles of the 50's merge together to look like one barrel? Also, do you know if the aft 20m.m. was replaced by the 40 m.m. kit after the modification of the roll off racks happened. Would appriciate it if you could shed some light on this. Thanks, bob.
blaster76
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Model Shipwrights: 3,509 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2014 - 03:44 PM UTC
man the nit picking and bashing. I thought that was only on the other site about 10 years ago and in the tank section. Love the tank section argue over what tank had this and that. Had some guy swear up and down that a certain panther tank could not have this item on it according to the book he had about production. I pointed out cannabalization, field mods, useing old stock up first.. next day there were 15 pix posted showing what i said. Looks like they both agree no canvas on the outside of deck. good i wouldn't have done that mod anyway. and of course my all time favorite. color. LOL mix it with water, gas, turpentine , paint thinner. thick thin. Show 10 pix of this and 10 pix of that. Weathering, repaint, touch up the variations probably roll into the 1000's

Both of you are acknowledged experts probably find you agree on far more than you disagree .

Arguments posted else where should be just that elsewhere

Thanks to both of you for your valued input over these many years nobody here thinks either of you are stupid
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2014 - 05:36 PM UTC
Bob, I won't be near my references until Sunday but will try to get you an answer then.

Al Ross
TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 12:34 AM UTC
Well, thank you for thinking I'm not, Mr. Joyce.

Funny thing, my old boss' name was Joyce ... I wonder if you're related.


Quoted Text

man the nit picking and bashing. I thought that was only on the other site about 10 years ago and in the tank section. Love the tank section argue over what tank had this and that. Had some guy swear up and down that a certain panther tank could not have this item on it according to the book he had about production. I pointed out cannabalization, field mods, useing old stock up first.. next day there were 15 pix posted showing what i said. Looks like they both agree no canvas on the outside of deck. good i wouldn't have done that mod anyway. and of course my all time favorite. color. LOL mix it with water, gas, turpentine , paint thinner. thick thin. Show 10 pix of this and 10 pix of that. Weathering, repaint, touch up the variations probably roll into the 1000's

Both of you are acknowledged experts probably find you agree on far more than you disagree .

Arguments posted else where should be just that elsewhere

Thanks to both of you for your valued input over these many years nobody here thinks either of you are stupid

Aurora-7
#360
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: June 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,020 posts
Model Shipwrights: 630 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 01:08 AM UTC

Quoted Text

man the nit picking and bashing.



Human nature.

Happens in every forum of every site, regardless of subject matter.
Robbd01
#323
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2013
KitMaker: 791 posts
Model Shipwrights: 59 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 02:30 AM UTC
I thought since the pot has been stirred up a bit on this subject, I might throw out another story on doing the 109 when JFK was skipper of it. A review of Italeri's PT-109 over at Cybermodeler mentioned an issue with a mis-fired torpedo. Here is the link to the review and I pasted the comment of said mis-fire.

"In the case of PT-109 before Lt(jg) John Kennedy took command, there was an accidental launch of the foreword starboard torpedo tube while in the stowed position and the departing torpedo took out the starboard depth charge rack and a section of the foot railing on its way overboard. The missing rack wasn't replaced by the time Kennedy came aboard."

http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/it/kit_it_5613.shtml


Cheers



PS - Any word on Merit's 1/48 early Elco kit release ?
TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 03:08 AM UTC
Well,

For one thing, it was the port side D/C rack, for another, it wasn't a misfire, if you'll read INTO THE DARK WATER, it was caused by the 109 hitting a wave a certain way. The D/C fell through the deck and landed in a crewmen's bunk. Not only that, it was a 'hot run' .... I think Ensign Thom stuffed something into the torpedo's props.

I COULD be wrong. But, that is what I remember reading.


Quoted Text

I thought since the pot has been stirred up a bit on this subject, I might throw out another story on doing the 109 when JFK was skipper of it. A review of Italeri's PT-109 over at Cybermodeler mentioned an issue with a mis-fired torpedo. Here is the link to the review and I pasted the comment of said mis-fire.

"In the case of PT-109 before Lt(jg) John Kennedy took command, there was an accidental launch of the foreword starboard torpedo tube while in the stowed position and the departing torpedo took out the starboard depth charge rack and a section of the foot railing on its way overboard. The missing rack wasn't replaced by the time Kennedy came aboard."

http://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/it/kit_it_5613.shtml


Cheers



PS - Any word on Merit's 1/48 early Elco kit release ?

TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 03:10 AM UTC
And, also, I don't think there's evidence to support the statement of the rack being replaced.

Tim Connelly
dioman13
Visit this Community
Indiana, United States
Joined: August 19, 2007
KitMaker: 2,184 posts
Model Shipwrights: 204 posts
Posted: Friday, November 21, 2014 - 03:31 AM UTC
Hey Al, Thanks alot for the help. Digging up pics and referance on P.T.'s is like trying to pull a tooth from a submerged whale. bob
TAFFY3
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 2,531 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,244 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 22, 2014 - 05:30 AM UTC
[quote]
Quoted Text

Anyone have pictures, drawings, or info about just how it was mounted? It would make an interesting modification. Al





Same boat, different angle:



Noticed something interesting in the background of this photo. There is a single .50 cal. MG mounted on a simple post in front of the upside-down dinghy on the foredeck. Looks to me as if it has the early style ammo box usually seen on A/C. In the book "First Up", about PT-157, there is a photo of an unidentified boat from RON 9 (author states that it is not the 157) with the same type of mount on the foredeck. Wonder if more than two boats in that Squadron carried a similar mount? Al
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 - 12:47 AM UTC
Here is a photo of what the image's file name identifies as PT 156 (foreground) and 157 (background) at Finchaven

and one from the same batch as 157.

On 156, the tripod pipe mount closest to the charthouse is a twin .50 and the 37mm forward isn't mounted on its pedestal. Go over to the PT BOAT FORUM http://ptboatforum.com/cgi-bin/MB2/netboard.cgi and do a search for RON 9. There are a number of interesting discussions by some very knowledgeable guys on RON 9 related topics.

Al Ross
TAFFY3
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: January 21, 2008
KitMaker: 2,531 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,244 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 - 04:19 PM UTC
Interesting photos, looks like that could be 156 on the bow of the boat in the foreground. A later period in RON 9's history than the time frame outlined in the book. The second photo looks to me as if it could be the same boat.



What in heck is that between the 20mm and the 37mm on the foredeck? Looks like an upside down cart! Curiouser and curiouser. Al
TGarthConnelly
Visit this Community
Connecticut, United States
Joined: August 03, 2008
KitMaker: 875 posts
Model Shipwrights: 872 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 - 08:14 PM UTC
A wheel barrel.
alross2
Visit this Community
Maine, United States
Joined: May 18, 2006
KitMaker: 317 posts
Model Shipwrights: 308 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 23, 2014 - 09:10 PM UTC
The rectangular object is most likely a ready-service locker. I enlarged the photo to try and get a better look at the round objects, but the photo was too grainy to see much. There were two deadlights in that approximate location and the lower portion of the discs looks flat. These may be motor driven vents that they cobbled together to suck the heat out of the crew quarters. I have both of Bridge's books coming this week and maybe there are better photos in there. They are not on the 156.

Al Ross