Howdy again fellas,
Ya know, one of the 'things' about posting to a thread where most of the blokes paying attention to it are just "paying attention" to it and not yakking back at ya is that, you begin to think you're just talking to yourself..........but hey, that's alright......I'm rarely listened to anyway........
to Lagumiles: First, a hearty and warm welcome to the site! Glad to have ya hangin' around.......you'll have loads of fun with these blokes!
Now, to your post.....when I first read it, I couldn't make any sense of it (you hadn't properly posted your pic). But what's
really funny, is that, just like jimbrae's remark "...
Anmoga - now THAT is a coincidence!..." I too have a coincidence.
I was up quite late last night ref-surfing for LCM photos, and ya know what I found that I thought would illustrate my 'researched' placement of the added hull section on my LCM?.........the very pic you just posted!
Yep. The unpainted section in that photo correlates
exactly with my researched placement of the addendum hull addition.........how about that?......I'm happy.
But. To move on.
I've built up the added section (mentioned above) into a 'Master' configuration. Meaning, I'm going to consider making 'dupes' of the extra hull piece that would turn the lower hull of the LCM (3) into the more accurate (especially for the box art) LCM (6). I 've already started on both the extra floatation buldges, which are mounted 'saddlebag' style on later 'Tango's'. And I've also finally gotten the final piece of the schematic puzzle pertaining to ensuring the accuracy of my alterations. With any luck, it will all fall together.
An observation if I may?
Even though my time spent researching this wee project has been rather lengthy, it
does make me wonder just
how much the larger corporations like Tamiya, Italeri, or Trumpeter spend trying to get their new kit offerings right?
I mean, a major mistake like depicting the LCM (3) disgorging an M4A1(3) Sherman tank onto the beach and hiring a talented artist to paint a picture showing this rather inaccurate portrayal is kind of a Simpson "D'oh!"......one would think,
Tread.