1350
USS Lexington (CV2) 1927-1942

Stage 19: hull (part 2) and dry run


Kit parts: 15
Scratch parts: 32
PE parts: 14
Time: 4.5 hours


The ‘brows’ (B16 and B17) were fitted to the completed hull and flight deck assembly to ensure a good fit between the two. They both extended 1mm beyond the edge of the flight but this was easily rectified by slicing off the protrusions, filling the resulting gap and finishing off.

Nine jack rods (stretched sprue) were fitted to the underside of each of the ‘brows’. There should be ten, but my datum point was the hawse hole approximately midway along, divided by the length to the front edge of the flight deck. The distance between each worked out at 7.2mm, but there was insufficient length to fit a tenth before the light AA sponson.

Three jack rods were fitted to the underside of each of the forward light AA sponsons. A horizontal jack rod around the periphery neatly disguised some rather poor moulding detail in this area.



Above: Jack rods fitted to undersides of ‘brows’ and light AA platforms .



The braces (B10 and B11) were a little too long and were therefore cut a corresponding amount short at the hull end to match up with the locating holes.

The internal platforms (A18, A19, A20) in the port side boat pockets were used as they were correct apart from cutting to length to suit the detailed interiors. The GMM PE ladders (F14) were exactly the right length. This was a surprise, not because of any inaccuracy on the part of GMM, but because they had to fit an exact dimension on a combination of the Nautilus wooded deck superimposed on an inaccurate and distortion-prone hull.



Above: Port side boat pocket platform extension and external ladder.



In contrast to the rest of the kit, the elevator well assemblies are a delight in terms of accuracy and detail. The only additions were two polystyrene rectangular section beams secured across the bases of each of the elevator wells on which the elevator platforms would sit.



Above: Elevator well assemblies and platform support beams before fitting to underside of flight deck.



With all the major assemblies complete, it was time for a dry-run to check that everything was coming together as it should. I planned to paint the major assemblies separately so as to avoid any necessary masking off between, for example, the bridge and stack assemblies and the flight deck. This would also make it easier to paint decks and then assemble further structures on top.





Above: Dry run of major assemblies before painting.

About the Author

About Chris Smithers (smithec)
FROM: ENGLAND - EAST ANGLIA, UNITED KINGDOM

1966-1971: Art college in Twickenham and Blackpool 1971-1973: Commercial art studio, Ipswich, Suffolk 1973-1975: Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands 1975: Lecturer Ravensbourne School of Art, Bromley, Kent 1976: Marketing Communications, IT systems and software house, London. Got married...


Comments

Hi Joseph, Yeah, it was a lot of research. I was DETERMINED to make it abolutely as accurate as possible. What I don't understand is how Trumpeter got so much of it grotesquely wrong. Anyway, thanks for your comments. I sure hope you find my feature useful - from what I've seen the 1:700 from Trumpeter is just a scaled down version of the 1:350 kit, including everything that's wrong with the big one!
JUL 08, 2008 - 05:36 AM
Hi Rui Well, well, well. I used to be a graphic designer myself as well. And a copywriter. Hence what I hope is a deal of professionalism in my SBS guide. The whole project spanned two years. I didn't dare start another model in all that time, knowing it would simply delay completion and possibly I would lose my motivation. Sometimes it was very hard to keep going - the progress when doing the armament and the air group seemed so slow. I really had to force myself to keep going. Thanks for the advice on using Clearcoat on the decals. Actually, that is what I did use, in order to soften the decals so they would lay close on the curved fuselage sides, to get them to stick, and to try and dull them down. All the planes were matt varnished as well, but that still didn't kill the decal edge reflection. You can see some of my 1:700 stuff at: LINK If you select my name from the top of the menu on the left you can see all my galleries. By the way, the 1:700 Trumpeter Lexington looks like just a scaled-down version of the 1:350 version, including everything that is wrong and inaccurate. So please, please, do use all the research I did to get it right. I look forward to seeing the result! Regards, Chris
JUL 08, 2008 - 05:48 AM
Jim Your comments an honour indeed. I have followed your work over the years at Modelwarships.com and you really are the best. Counting the hours is actually a way of giving myelf a sanity check! Which is why to some extent the whole project took me two years from start to finish. Regards, Chris
JUL 08, 2008 - 05:53 AM
Thanks for taking time to answer to my questions! I have the 1/700 Trumpeter model, for Coral Sea fit, so I guess you have done all the research for me - but still, I have to get the work myself! Not for now, but for a "near" future (I am currently working on three projects, one a full scratch all in 1/700). Thanks for the link, and since my memory is better for graphics, than for names, I can say that I had already seen your Sara / Lex duo in MW. Please keep up - keep your ship models afloat! Rui
JUL 08, 2008 - 05:57 AM
Are you sure that thing is a model. It looks so real. In some of those photos it looks too real. Nice job. Amazinglly nice job. Great tribute to those who sailed, fought and died on board the original Lady Lex carrier. Nice work.
JUL 11, 2008 - 08:46 AM
Hi Chris, Sorry no plans on any new 1/350 items. You could use my YC-728 or 829 for an open ammunition lighter. I have some photos of their use as such.
JUL 15, 2008 - 07:06 AM
Hello Chris: I just finished reading your build log. Outstanding work and very well written. I have this kit, not sure I want to tackle all the inaccuracies vice just building an OOB kit, but, your work is inspirational and you presented a lot of neat ideas to enhance the kit. I will be referencing your build log when I tackle mine. Thanks for posting and sharing.
FEB 10, 2015 - 08:49 AM
Mark, I doubt Chris will respond as this is a 7 year old tread and Chris last signed in 7 years ago.
FEB 10, 2015 - 09:13 AM
Thanks for the heads up. Still a great build log.
FEB 11, 2015 - 04:15 AM
wow, awesome model building. well worth resurrecting the thread and feature.
FEB 11, 2015 - 09:17 AM