Quoted Text
Did this work the same for the Army? Did Macarthur and Eisenhower report to Sec Army or to Chief of Staff Marshall (VMI "01)
I haven't been able to determine PRECISELY the command relationships that MacArthur and Eisenhower had (reporting to the Chief of Staff OR directly to the President, but I did find this:
Marshall was given the rank of a five-star general in December 1944. Along with William Leahy he was senior to Ernest King, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur and Henry Arnold.
The whole issue of who reports to whom has gone back and forth. During the Cold war we had "Specified" (single service) and "Unified" (multi-service) Commands, headed by various Service 4-Stars. These commanders I believe reported to the President, and not through either their respective Service Chief OR Service Secretary. I believe there have been changes to that now which place the Service Chiefs as well as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs into the Chain of Command.
One thing I know for certain. Whoever is the "Chief of Staff of the Army" is ALWAYS the highest ranking Army General, with the earliest date of rank, and the sequence number 1 on the General Officer list. (unless an Army General happens to be the Chairman of the JCS). Whenever they select a new Chief of Staff, it is customary for any more senior 4 stars to retire.
One thing I know that Rumsfeld did is that he abolished the term "Commander in Chief, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx", which was the traditional title of these 4 star commanders. Not understanding the LONG tradition behind these titles, (and no doubt just plain not giving a damn!) he declared that there was ONLY one "commander in chief" and these guys are now simply "Commander, xxxxxxxxxx"
Tom