You are viewing the archived version of the site.
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
Go to modelshipwrights.com for the current dynamic site!
Campaigns
Want to be part of a group build? This is where to start, plan, and meet about them.
Want to be part of a group build? This is where to start, plan, and meet about them.
Hosted by Jim Starkweather
Official: Silent Service Campaign
Posted: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - 08:51 AM UTC
David - thanks for the prompt reply. I've been following your build and hoping that my surgery on the conning tower will come out as well as yours. I used Tamiya XF-77 INJ Gray (Sasebo Arsenal)for the top surfaces.
North4003

Joined: August 01, 2012
KitMaker: 960 posts
Model Shipwrights: 58 posts

Posted: Sunday, January 17, 2016 - 08:58 AM UTC
Here is a suggested campaign ribbon.


Posted: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 - 01:52 AM UTC
I like the ribbon Brent.
I had some time to work on the I-19 this weekend. The hull construction is complete and it is ready for a coat of gloss and some weathering.

There is still a lot of etch to be added to the conning tower and it is not attached to the deck yet.


There is also the aircraft to paint, I'm still not sure how I'm going to paint the canopy framing in this scale.
I had some time to work on the I-19 this weekend. The hull construction is complete and it is ready for a coat of gloss and some weathering.

There is still a lot of etch to be added to the conning tower and it is not attached to the deck yet.


There is also the aircraft to paint, I'm still not sure how I'm going to paint the canopy framing in this scale.
Posted: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 - 02:20 AM UTC
I like Brent's ribbon, too.
And your I-19's coming along nicely, Cam. Particularly the crane work.
And your I-19's coming along nicely, Cam. Particularly the crane work.
Posted: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 - 05:23 AM UTC
Cam,
Nice paint job on your I19, very crisp and clean. Like you said, it is interesting to watch another build of the same kit and compare the differences of work flow.
Brent, the ribbon looks great. Once my I19 is done I will be entering the I400 for this campaign.
Dave
Nice paint job on your I19, very crisp and clean. Like you said, it is interesting to watch another build of the same kit and compare the differences of work flow.
Brent, the ribbon looks great. Once my I19 is done I will be entering the I400 for this campaign.
Dave
RedDuster

Joined: March 01, 2010
KitMaker: 7,078 posts
Model Shipwrights: 6,649 posts

Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 01:34 AM UTC
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 03:48 AM UTC
Hi All,
I am reposting my 2 sample inputs for a possible ribbon.
I was told I needed to lighten the back grounds up so it showed up better.
Here they are.
I am reposting my 2 sample inputs for a possible ribbon.
I was told I needed to lighten the back grounds up so it showed up better.
Here they are.
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 03:49 AM UTC
Hum, They still look dark when posting them but maybe not as much........
Posted: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 - 05:28 AM UTC
Si, Great work on your X-Craft. Looking forward to seeing the weathering applied.
Jeff - I'm partial to the one in the right.
Dave
Jeff - I'm partial to the one in the right.
Dave
RedDuster

Joined: March 01, 2010
KitMaker: 7,078 posts
Model Shipwrights: 6,649 posts

Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 - 01:48 AM UTC
Thanks Dave,
Hope to make some progress on that at the weekend.
Jeff,
I'm with Dave. like the one on the right.
Cheers
Si
Hope to make some progress on that at the weekend.
Jeff,
I'm with Dave. like the one on the right.
Cheers
Si
Posted: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 - 10:03 PM UTC
Thanks guys, Brent's is really nice as well.....
Posted: Friday, February 12, 2016 - 01:42 AM UTC
Hi all,
Now that the I19 is currently undergoing sea trials it was time to redirect the shipyard workers to their next task.
Tamiya's IJN I400 with Eduard PE set, Voyager PE set and an Artwox deck.


The dock workers were able to install the ballast and forward dive planes.

After that the crane, rear radio mast and forward hull plate were installed.

More to come soon.
Dave
Now that the I19 is currently undergoing sea trials it was time to redirect the shipyard workers to their next task.
Tamiya's IJN I400 with Eduard PE set, Voyager PE set and an Artwox deck.
The dock workers were able to install the ballast and forward dive planes.
After that the crane, rear radio mast and forward hull plate were installed.
More to come soon.
Dave
PrickleHead

Joined: December 31, 2013
KitMaker: 338 posts
Model Shipwrights: 11 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 14, 2016 - 05:19 AM UTC
I was originally in with Revell's 1/72 Type XXVII Seehund but I have acquired Bronco's 1/35 of the same type.




Posted: Monday, February 22, 2016 - 05:20 AM UTC
HI everyone,
A little more work on the I400.
Here are the major parts for the conning tower.

and here is the conning tower dry fitted to the hull.


I hope to get some more time to work on her soon. But I leave you with a picture of the bow with some PE attached.

Dave
A little more work on the I400.
Here are the major parts for the conning tower.
and here is the conning tower dry fitted to the hull.
I hope to get some more time to work on her soon. But I leave you with a picture of the bow with some PE attached.
Dave
DAR

Joined: April 27, 2002
KitMaker: 250 posts
Model Shipwrights: 12 posts

Posted: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 - 03:47 AM UTC
Your I-400 is looking good Dave. I have an old resin I-400 kit in the stash, although I can't quite remember who produced it. Seawolf maybe? It was quite a few years ago.
I'm tempted to pick up some of the after market bits and pieces that you have there for it.
I'm tempted to pick up some of the after market bits and pieces that you have there for it.
Posted: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 - 04:11 PM UTC
David,
Thanks. I have never seen the resin kit, would be interested to see some shots of that. I have the Eduard and the Voyager PE kits for the Tamiya I400. The Eduard is nice but the voyager is a little flimsy. That being said both kits have parts that the other does not.
Will dive more into the I400 within the coming days.
Dave
Thanks. I have never seen the resin kit, would be interested to see some shots of that. I have the Eduard and the Voyager PE kits for the Tamiya I400. The Eduard is nice but the voyager is a little flimsy. That being said both kits have parts that the other does not.
Will dive more into the I400 within the coming days.
Dave
DAR

Joined: April 27, 2002
KitMaker: 250 posts
Model Shipwrights: 12 posts

Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 - 03:17 AM UTC
I'll sort out some pictures of it Dave.
Posted: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 - 06:50 AM UTC
David,
That would be great, Thanks.
Dave
That would be great, Thanks.
Dave
Posted: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 - 08:35 AM UTC
Posted: Thursday, March 03, 2016 - 02:13 AM UTC
Cam,
Sorry to hear about the accident. It looks like you have recovered well though. Your I19 looks great. I really like the nameplate, it really pops.
I got lucky with the I400, it appeared on ebay for a great price so I took the plunge. It still pops up ebery once in a while at a low price. If I find one ill let you know.
Dave
Sorry to hear about the accident. It looks like you have recovered well though. Your I19 looks great. I really like the nameplate, it really pops.
I got lucky with the I400, it appeared on ebay for a great price so I took the plunge. It still pops up ebery once in a while at a low price. If I find one ill let you know.
Dave
Posted: Thursday, March 03, 2016 - 02:57 PM UTC
I am in with HMS M1.
M1 was developed towards the end of the First World War. Unique in the history of submarines, she was fitted with a 12" gun from a scrapped battleship.
This allowed the M-class submarine to sneak up on shore installations and surface vessels, rise to the surface and delivered a formidable blow from very short range.
M1 was not deployed in combat because the Royal Navy feared that Germany would copy their design. The U-boat war against the British merchant fleet may have been even worse if the Germans had deployed this idea.
After the war, M1 and her two sisters were used experimentally on developing a range of new submarine technologies. M3 was converted into a minelayer before being scrapped in the 1930's. M2 was converted into the world's first submarine carrier. She carried a small stainless steel-framed seaplane. She sank after it appeared she dived without closing the hanger doors.
M1 disappeared with the loss of her crew of 69 while submerged on exercise in November 1925. Her wreck was discovered in 1999.
This kit comes from MikrMir and represents M1.

Plastic parts are few but perfectly formed.

30 pieces to be precise. There are no options for M2 or M3.
Actually there are more photo-etched pieces than styrene

I have never built a sub before and in 1/350 scale it's tiny.
Hopefully it will be a nice simple build. I need one at the moment.
cheers
Michael
M1 was developed towards the end of the First World War. Unique in the history of submarines, she was fitted with a 12" gun from a scrapped battleship.
This allowed the M-class submarine to sneak up on shore installations and surface vessels, rise to the surface and delivered a formidable blow from very short range.
M1 was not deployed in combat because the Royal Navy feared that Germany would copy their design. The U-boat war against the British merchant fleet may have been even worse if the Germans had deployed this idea.
After the war, M1 and her two sisters were used experimentally on developing a range of new submarine technologies. M3 was converted into a minelayer before being scrapped in the 1930's. M2 was converted into the world's first submarine carrier. She carried a small stainless steel-framed seaplane. She sank after it appeared she dived without closing the hanger doors.
M1 disappeared with the loss of her crew of 69 while submerged on exercise in November 1925. Her wreck was discovered in 1999.
This kit comes from MikrMir and represents M1.

Plastic parts are few but perfectly formed.

30 pieces to be precise. There are no options for M2 or M3.
Actually there are more photo-etched pieces than styrene

I have never built a sub before and in 1/350 scale it's tiny.
Hopefully it will be a nice simple build. I need one at the moment.
cheers
Michael
DAR

Joined: April 27, 2002
KitMaker: 250 posts
Model Shipwrights: 12 posts

Posted: Saturday, March 05, 2016 - 08:03 PM UTC
Fordboy

Joined: July 13, 2004
KitMaker: 2,169 posts
Model Shipwrights: 1,597 posts

Posted: Sunday, March 06, 2016 - 03:06 AM UTC
Ahoy Michael
Very interesting choice of subject.
I learnt a little more submarine history today.
Cheers
Sean
Very interesting choice of subject.
I learnt a little more submarine history today.
Cheers
Sean
Posted: Sunday, March 06, 2016 - 01:26 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Ahoy Michael
Very interesting choice of subject.
I learnt a little more submarine history today.
Cheers
Sean
Cheers Sean,
I'm glad I could enlightened you further on the silent service.
Michael
Posted: Sunday, March 06, 2016 - 01:32 PM UTC
Well it has not proved to be as straightforward as I would have hoped!
The hull went together well but the conning tower superstructure insert was both too long and too wide. Fortunately due my recent endeavours elsewhere there was plenty of filler and sandpaper to hand. The gun mantel was also too tall.
Nevertheless some progress was made.


cheers
Michael
The hull went together well but the conning tower superstructure insert was both too long and too wide. Fortunately due my recent endeavours elsewhere there was plenty of filler and sandpaper to hand. The gun mantel was also too tall.
Nevertheless some progress was made.


cheers
Michael
![]() |

























